Showing posts with label music. Show all posts
Showing posts with label music. Show all posts

Friday, 24 August 2018

A Couple of Things

I dreamt that everyday we played a game: we took turns putting music on that the other had to listen to the end. That would be a forced exposure to otherness, a sort of gym for our brains. The other has to wait for the very next end of the day to repay the favour, or to exact revenge: our patience gym. We’d have twenty-four hours to come up with what music to play: our slow-thinking gym.

Then I thought that films are bullshit because if our daily chores were accompanied by music we’d look good as well even while doing the most menial of things. I’m not so sure if our lives would look much better if they were scripted like films. But they’d would definitely benefit from a wardrobe specialist, make-up artist, and perfect lighting.

Now I must go to find the perfect soundtrack for taking a shit.

Thursday, 28 June 2018

The Real Poets of Today

in memory of Anthony Bourdain

I'm not a poet. 

I do try to write poems, but if they fully become so or not that's beyond my control. 
A friend once said that if you write at least one good poem then you are a poet.
It’s a very low bar. 
And it would make an anthology of all good poems extremely unwieldy. 

But I’m not a poet in another sense as well.
The primal poets were those who first used language to rhyme, to make it easier to memorise lines. *
In my proposition, they ceased to be the poets with the appearance of the writer as a star in the twentieth century. 
Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Faulkner, to name a few, or to name only three.
They were sexy, they were it, they were poets.
And they were replaced by songwriters in the 1960’s.
Who in turn were superseded by rappers in the 1990's.
And rappers, in the 2000’s, were unseated by TV-star chefs.
Thus chefs are the real poets of today.

And poets laureate are those chefs who cook with laurel.


 _____________



 * Since the Advent of Free Online Porn (FOP), oral tradition has only sexual connotations.



Wednesday, 2 November 2016

Trial and error


Side by side, a couple of young lovers placed the L and R eartips in each's appropriate ear canal.
The earphones wires became one necklace when their free ears touched.
The plan was to form a full circle of shared simultaneous experience, thought exchange, and equal enjoyment.
Their indexes pressed the single play button.
The music kicked in.
It didn't fully work.
But they tried.







Sunday, 22 May 2016

“Play it, Franz. For old times' sake.”

If we replace Franz with Sam, the resulting utterance is the most famous in the history of cinema but usually reproduced wrongly as “Play it again, Sam.” That would be a great way to start an article on how easily tricked our brains are, or on how we collectively pass down information of events that never were; myths as one example. But this one, Sam, is going to be about what you were there forfor music.

It seems I'm one of those who came equipped to this world lacking the starstruck gene, or whatever it is that makes us want to have children with a person we know almost no thing about except that his or her performance is messing with our entire beings. So you can easily imagine my dropping jaw when watching footage of a The Beatles' gig, and all that mass hysterical screaming, and all that fainting.

But...

The thing is that it would be implausible that all of a sudden in the early 1960's a part of humanity had suffered a mutation that made it swoon in the presence of music composers and performers. And that thought leads me back to Franz, Ferenc, Franciscus, all of them Liszt, out of a list of alternative names for the very same composer.

Liszt is reputed to have been one of the rare both composers and virtuoso performers of the 19th century, while his pieces were famous for being dubbed as unplayable, or for requiring four hands to be performed. This is easily perceived in his only piano sonata known as Piano Sonata in B. Minor. That's quite a stolid name for a piece that could have been known as I Am the Yellow Submarine and I Will Dive in You. The shift of emotions throughout the piece, and the intensity that playing it requires, surely drew many a sigh from the lady concert goers of that time. “Oh, Franz...”

And why? Because, most likely, Liszt's music would have sounded as a break from what the ears of that time were used to, in a pleasant way. He was the shit of his own time. And music and our very existence seem to the fatally tied to one another, from the heartbeat of our mother, from the resonance of her voice in our first concert hall: the womb, to the sound of our hands and feet first stamping the floor. No surprise then that music turned out to be therapeutic in some instances.

Musical score sheets, with their allegro energetico or con strepito entries, might be seen today as elitist or snob. I'm inclined to believe though that, if those kind of entries were renamed mentally to fuck all or bring the house down, the gold wash that they seem to wear would wear off. And thus we could see the bare nature of the geniuses behind them, regardless of the epoch each was born in.

My niece C and her colleagues and teachers did exactly that last night to an even older rock star, Claudio Monteverdi. By erecting a performance with humour and amour, and in spite of the gold wash the 17th concert hall in need of repairs exhibited, they were able to transport the sex-appeal that Monteverdi brought to the world in that same century and the one before to the 21st.

“Play it, Franz. For first times' sake.”



Monday, 25 August 2014

Classic and New


for Jennifer


I don’t believe in soul mates, love.

That would be demeaning to you:
you who were born in years later
made specifically for me? Yikes! 

What I’m sure it exists is rhyme,

where we can rhyme with others
in couplets, strophes that we read
to others each, then to each other.

All our poems depend on factors

beyond reason and thus in poetry,
which is music in text fabricated,
from the mighty ode to the petty.

Even without text we still dance

and our common dance is tango:
the male holding you, directing 
your female self back to trance.

All of us slaves to our rhythms,

which rhyme even in dissonance, 
the length of our time revolving
on how we rhyme day after day.

My rhyme and dance with you

is scary: we might not stop ever,
thus I sense fever lurking yonder,
as music without silence is eerie.

Yet we rhyme as we never did:

to celebrate such new wonders
I opted here for a rhyme different
with alliterative letters or words. 

[pause for a tango nuevo arabesque]

As I write my love poems to you,
freedom of speech is decapitated
fundamentally, almost yesterday,
a vulgar yesterday that's yet to die.

I wonder if similar worldly events

that turn lovers' woo into wounds
should make my wooing you end 
or by rebel contrast gain weight.

This much I know: the structural
world is flawed, and we must try 
to bring back its humane stance 
by rhythm and structure of tango.

A pause, love. And here we go.



_______

image: a postcard of circa 1919.