Sunday, 2 October 2005

Stereogamic thoughts

The man was loved

Because he did not take himself seriously.

 

Those who take themselves seriously are loved

Not by this man.

 

The man was happy

Because he was sadder than the majority.

 

If he was like the majority of those who are happy

He would be a sad man.

 

Really, the man was a man

Performing all functions a man can in all his virility.

 

And what kind of manhood is that of a man who is a man

Who practices monogamy?

 

‘Unnaturally castrated,’ the man

Would promptly reply. And would add, ‘Fertility

 

Is to spread these genes I carry inside my man.

You fuck; I flourish.’

 

Unfortunately this could lead

To war to stop the proliferation of the enemy,

 

Which in turn would lead vast armies of lead

To end all wars.

 

The enemy of man reacts

To any action, for the enemy of man is biology

 

Which always to the rules of physics reacts

Which clearly state:

 

For every movement

There is a counter-movement. Immobility

 

Is a movement or a counter-movement?

And does physics rule

 

Then over biology? The man

Did not continue such an intriguing study

 

For that would consume all time the man

Had for reproducing

 

His own thoughts.

Not to mention that it could malignantly 

 

Start a war between the warriors of thoughts,

Whom we call scientists.

 

So if the man did not obey

The imperatives of biology, what kind of man would he…

 

‘Unnaturally castrated.’ Ah, thank you. ‘I just obey

Your commands.’

 

Is the man obedient?

Maybe sometimes the man is wisely

 

Thinking he will be better off by being obedient.

‘Or, at least, pretending to be.’

 

The man described above

Perhaps one day will answer out of integrity.

 

Or maybe the man partly described above

Will forge his decorum.

 

Either way or any other

Way, will we let the man be what many

 

Other men would like to be; the other?

He will thank thee.